Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Dar es Salaam or Mombasa? Uganda decides

By now, the story has been well told. Last week Uganda announced that it would no longer purchase petroleum products from Kenya because middlemen inflated prices by up to 59 percent, imposing too high a cost on consumers.

Under the new arrangement, the Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC) will be buying the country’s fuel stock from refiner Vitol Bahrain and distributing it to oil marketing companies (OMCs) in Uganda, transporting it through Kenya’s Mombasa and Tanzania’s Dar es Salaam ports.

Part of the wrinkle for the Uganda government follows Kenya’s decision earlier in the year to drop the Open Tender System (OTS) in favour of direct procurement under a government-to-government deal with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

In the G-to-G deal, the three Gulf State-owned firms – Saudi Aramco, Abu Dhabi Oil Company (ADNOC), and Emirates National Oil Company (Enoc) – were given the freedom to handpick local OMCs to distribute fuel on their behalf. They chose three.

Because Kenya-based OMCs supply 90 percent to Uganda, Kampala seems to feel let down because Kenya didn’t consult it before making the move which has led to irregular supplies, and a higher price tag.

It would seem a fairly straight story, but it isn’t. Kenyan media and commentators almost uniformly said Uganda had “banned” fuel imports from Kenya, and that it was a slap in the face for President William Ruto. It was probably stretching it a little to see this as a rebuff of President Ruto, or a fallout because Uganda President Yoweri Museveni sent a delegation to give him a heads-up

However, this Uganda move doesn’t ban Kenyan oil, and the devil is in the details. The amendment to the Petroleum Supply Act that will give legal force to the new order, “authorises the Minister [of Energy], with the approval of Cabinet, to nominate any other person to import petroleum products for the Uganda market”.

Should the new arrangement with UNOC at the centre flounder, that provision opens a back door for imports from Kenya. One can almost be sure that some fuel will be imported through that channel because the back door is now a very precious instrument for the minister and other powerful people to trade in for a big cheque.

Tanzanian media, on the other hand, said Uganda has chosen Dar es Salaam port for its oil imports “after fallout with Kenya”.

This presentation of events is understandable from a coastal perspective. Landlocked countries like Uganda are never absolutist in their policy and relationship with their neighbours who give them access to sea ports for their exports and imports. It is not because they don’t despise or, even, hate, them.

They do. I have been in rooms where ministers and officials from East Africa’s landlocked nations have said the most terrible things about their coastal neighbours, and two days later watched in awe at their pragmatism as they held their noses, showered them with praises, gave them bear hugs, and kissed them on the cheeks.

If you are landlocked, you learn to run with the hare and hunt with the hounds to survive. Museveni, for all his outspokenness, is careful to rub the occupants of the Kenyan and Tanzanian state houses with their fair share of massage oil.

And Kampala is very good at this dance. The most difficult period for the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) government was during the late former President Daniel arap Moi’s rule in Kenya.

In 1986, an eager new left-leaning government in Kampala, with a cash-poor economy recovering from a decade of chaos, wanted to cut its costs by transporting its imports and exports through Kenya by railway (the line between the two countries still worked then).

However, Kenyan long-distance trucking cartels, which were deep in bed with senior figures in the ruling KANU government in Nairobi, wouldn’t hear of it.

Relations grew so sour that Uganda and Kenya exchanged fire across their common border over it, and Nairobi imposed a selective blockade on goods going to its western neighbour.

In the end, all was sorted out. Key KANU figures and their business buddies were given a waiver, and people close to Moi were allowed to continue smuggling coffee and trucking contraband to Uganda and through it further into the eastern Africa hinterland. On the Ugandan side, their allies who had fled to exile in Nairobi and other cities in the last years of President Jomo Kenyatta’s rule during the dictatorship of Field Marshal Idi Amin and had also come in the second wave of Ugandan exiles from 1980 to 1986, cashed in on the commercial links they had established in Kenya to get their cut.

It’s 37 years later. People in that network on both sides have grown old and some died. Relationships not nurtured have atrophied. Time has moved on.

The in-oil middlemen in Kenya today are not from the Jomo Kenyatta, Moi, or even Mwai Kibaki era. In the background, the unsaid (though not definitive) part of the problem is that there are wrong middlemen in place in Nairobi.